🔗 Share this article

I possess a few opinions about the comments delivered by ESPN commentator Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's win over the American player in the US Open last eight. Look – the athlete represents American, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions often lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of letdown was appropriate. Rather, he brought up the ongoing absence of American men at the majors: not one of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone love a narrative, myself included. But really. Even if the American had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an official match. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, against whom the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a tired Djokovic in the subsequent match). He said in press after the loss that he actually preferred his draw, because it presented the opportunity to defeat the top three competitors in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is well justified to aim for the achievement; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match who else sensibly had the lack of US winners on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

The American, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the global rankings starting the upcoming year-end championships and has won his previous six matches over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. Presumably he might claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that’s as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class serve and concussive power on both forehand and reverse side are more than enough to defeat the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. Against the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is frequently overmatched. The last several seasons has seen the curious emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless move around with the alarming quickness and grace of smaller players. He is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was controlling, and hitting a soft shot against him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a quite severe limitation on his potential.

The American has achieved a number of significant, unexpected advancements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly surged up to No 4 – and held the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and including a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the ongoing slump of US male players lifting grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in July.

The American's play in that exact quarter-final should have been enough of an sign. The Serbian triumphed in four rounds, a win that only felt uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared evenly matched during the exchanges, with the American earning numerous chances to break. But Djokovic rescued break point after service break opportunity, extending the streak to the brink of frustration. When Fritz eventually did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible game to drop serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to expend far too much effort to prevail. Facing match points in the final game, his primary delivery floated to the sky. He extended the match twice on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, only a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite ironclad evidence that Fritz is not good enough to beat any version of the Serbian, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and never particularly seem like he believed he could win. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his physical powers anymore, but has developed sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were expecting the American to prevail, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he would.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in press conferences, exceeding almost everyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, prepared to not just express how he feels or the tactic he believed determined a match, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States failing to spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Now that the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

American legend Group

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely dwell on it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly improbable for everybody else. {